Is Legalized Gambling a sign of needing funds for the Gaming Authority?
What's all the fuss about? Some are worried about the rise in violence and the impact it has on tourism in Las Vegas and the surrounding areas. Others are concerned about gambling becoming "too accessible."
Casinos are permitted in Nevada and Atlantic City, New Jersey; should other jurisdictions follow suit? A lot of counties appear to have little moral consideration for legalized gambling. This is evident in the growth of lotteries and online gambling operated by county governments. Critics claim that Main Street's growing number of gambling establishments will increase tax burdens on motorists and cause more distractions for motorists. Even supporters of legalized gambling say that legalized gambling could generate jobs in rural areas, which are losing their population due to the growth of businesses and marriage.
The debate over the legality of online gambling is divided into three main camps: those who believe gambling is morally wrong, those who believe it ought to be legal those who believe that casinos should be able to safeguard their machines from theft. Those who believe gambling is illegal, should not argue that those who engage in online casino slots are simply seeking escape from the realities of "real life" gambling. They claim that gambling online is simply replacing traditional gambling. Those who agree that it should be legally legal and open to the idea of licensed gaming provide a much different view.
Another issue that is raised in the debate that gambling that is licensed is illegal in its current form is the effect it has on tourists and business travelers. For instance, a person from a distant area would be unable to locate an establishment that has less taxes to pay in Las Vegas. In the city itself, certain new establishments such as an all-girls club or a luxury spa, are exempted from this moral dilemma. However, even in these permissive areas, slot machines as well as other gaming devices remain illegal.
The third concern is the effect of legalized gambling on the betting industry for sports. Legalized gambling can affect the accessibility of the services provided by the Las Vegas casinos. The state lottery, for example, will likely lose out on additional revenue if the law is changed. Sports books are also in danger of being shut down if they have to give up their slots and include online gaming in their menus.
Is this all a sign that gambling legalization is a wasteful decision? It's hard to answer without looking at the situation in a different light. One thing is clear: Proponents of legalized gaming believe in the merits of the idea. They believe it's a means to help people while simultaneously offering the traditional casino experience , but with a modern day twist.
They say the same thing about the effect of legalized gambling on the slot machines that stood outside of the New York Statehouse. The revolution of the slot machines according to them, left the New York Statehouse with an old-fashioned feel. Many residents complained about the loudness and the clogging of the slots and the slow speed of payment on the machines. The solution they came up with was to revamp the machines to improve their user-friendliness.
Everyone can decide for themselves if these arguments are valid. The bottom line is that politicians want to generate new revenue. They see the proposal as an excellent idea. If a proposal to allow casino gambling by a municipality isn't beneficial for them, then no one in the legislature will care much. I hope that the legislators will apply their common sense when they make these important decisions.